ReviewCureus2024
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eltrombopag Efficacy Combined With Immunosuppressive Drugs in Treatment of Severe Aplastic Anemia.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening disorder with high mortality. The only curative treatment is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but it is mainly for young patients with suitable donors. The alternative is immunosuppressive therapy (IST), which can improve blood counts in about 58% of patients, but many relapse after discontinuation. Recently, eltrombopag, a thrombopoietic receptor agonist, was tested. As a single drug, it improved blood counts in 40-50% of patients. However, combining eltrombopag and IST proved more effective and safer. A review of 20 randomized controlled trials with 2,469 patients showed that the group receiving eltrombopag and IST had a significantly higher overall response rate (86% vs. 74%) after six months. After two years, 54% of the experimental group had relapsed compared to 39% in the control group. Despite this, eltrombopag tends to increase relapse rates over time. In conclusion, combining eltrombopag with IST is a superior treatment for SAA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.