ReviewCureus2024
A Comprehensive Review of the Surface and Chromatic Properties of Monolithic Zirconia: Evaluating the Impact of Polishing and Finishing Methods on Aesthetics and Performance.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Polishing and Glazing on Surface Characteristics and Biofilm Formation on Zirconia: An In Vitro Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of the effect of artificial aging on the phase composition of zirconia dominated by the cubic and tetragonal phases with polished and glazed surfaces: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monolithic zirconia is widely used in dentistry due to its outstanding mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and aesthetic qualities. This review examines how different polishing and finishing methods impact the performance and appearance of monolithic zirconia restorations. Derived from zirconium, zirconia is a robust ceramic that exists in monoclinic, tetragonal, and cubic forms, with properties that prevent crack propagation. Monolithic zirconia, preferred over porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns, offers better aesthetics and avoids chipping. Various surface treatments, such as polishing and glazing, enhance zirconia's smoothness and wear characteristics. Polished zirconia is less abrasive to enamel than glazed zirconia, making it more suitable for opposing teeth. Research indicates that polished zirconia has a smoother surface and higher fracture resistance compared to other dental ceramics. Surface roughness, which is influenced by the treatment method, is crucial in minimizing wear on opposing teeth. Polished monolithic zirconia also shows high flexural strength, chipping resistance, and translucency. While both polishing and glazing reduce brightness, polishing better preserves translucency. The literature identifies polishing as the best post-processing method for enhancing zirconia's surface quality and mechanical properties without compromising its load-bearing capacity. In conclusion, polishing and finishing significantly improve the aesthetic and clinical performance of monolithic zirconia, confirming its effectiveness for durable and visually appealing dental restorations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.