ArticleCureus2024
Accuracy of the Measurement of Uterine Leiomyoma by Transabdominal Ultrasonography.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Uterine leiomyoma is a benign smooth muscle tumor. It does not necessarily require curative treatment, but if conservative management is chosen, it is important to rule out uterine leiomyosarcoma. When a size increase is observed, one must consider malignancy, and thus objective and cost-effective measurement of uterine size is important, especially for early detection of malignant change. Although MRI imaging is thought to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of uterine leiomyosarcoma, frequent MRI is impractical because of the incidence of uterine leiomyoma and the economic burden in real-world clinical practice. On the other hand, ultrasonography (US) is considered the most useful device in the observation of size changes. So this study aimed to examine the accuracy of the measurement of transabdominal US compared to MRI imaging. Materials and methods This retrospective study included 92 patients with uterine myoma ≥ 50 mm who undertook an MRI within 30 days after the transabdominal US. The longest diameter of the largest myoma (a), the longest diameter perpendicular to a in the sagittal image (b), and the longest diameter perpendicular to a and b in the axial image (c) were measured by US and MRI, and these were used to calculate the volume. Results were analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 3.1. Results The ICC for the volume and major axis of the largest myoma by US and MRI were 0.87 and 0.90, respectively. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 0.82-0.91 and 0.87-0.93, respectively. Both reliability levels ranged from good to excellent. ICC was 0.54 (95%CI 0.15-0.78) in myomas with a volume of >500 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.