ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Relationship between clinical manifestations and serological profile in patients affected by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- High Immunological Activity and the Re-Evaluation of Anti-SSA/SSB Antibodies as Prognostic Markers for Major Organ Damage in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Article
- Controlling cardiovascular risk factors reduces progression of atherosclerosis in a multiethnic cohort of patients with lupus.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Alexithymia and Psychological Profile in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical and Immunological Correlates.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Early detection and risk stratification in autoimmune-related interstitial lung disease: a state-of-the-art review.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Anti-CENP-B polarity divides SLE: divergent clinical-immune phenotypes and distinct treatment responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Impact of Smoking, Steroid Use and Immunosuppression on Anti-dsDNA Antibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of salivary total antioxidant capacity and total oxidant status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.BMC rheumatology · 2025Article
- Overview of Oxidative Stress in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of Sex on Infection Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by a variety of both signs and symptoms; it mainly affects women of childbearing age, with an estimated prevalence of 24/100,000 people in Europe and North America. SLE is often described as an antibodies-driven disease as its clinical manifestations are usually associated with the presence or the absence of specific antibodies. Objectives: To evaluate clinical manifestations in patients with SLE and to assess the relationship with the presence of specific antibodies by using real-world data. Methods: A retrospective study was performed; the 2019 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus were used to classify patients with SLE. Data concerning serological profiles (which included Antinuclear antibodies - ANA, anti dsDNA, anti-Ro/SS-A, anti-La/SS-B, anti-Smith) were gathered along with medical records of clinical manifestations. Complement levels were also tested for possible clinical correlations. χ² or Fisher's exact tests were utilized to establish associations between autoantibodies and symptoms. The odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. No correction was made for multiple testing; only a p-value 0.01 ≤ was considered significant. Results: One-hundred and twenty-seven patients (n=127, mean age 53.43 ± 14.02) were enrolled in this study. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were found to be statistically significant for both malar rash and proteinuria; anti-Ro/SSA antibodies showed an association with photosensitivity and pericarditis; furthermore, a strong association was found between anti-Ro antibodies and proteinuria, but only if anti-dsDNA antibodies were present as well. Patients who tested positive for anti-La/SSB antibodies correlated with a threefold increase in the risk of developing pericarditis. Lastly, anti-Smith appeared to be associated with NPSLE as well as an increased risk for both autoimmune hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: In our study, many associations confirmed those found in previous studies; however, new relationships between antibodies and clinical manifestations were found thus indicating the need for additional evaluations to assess these correlations further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.