Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39221228›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2024

Feasibility and acceptability of the ShareD dEciSIon making for patients with kidney failuRE to improve end-of-life care intervention: A pilot multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Louise Engelbrecht Buur, Hilary Louise Bekker, Henning Søndergaard, Michell Kannegaard, Jens Kristian Madsen, Dinah Sherzad Khatir, Jeanette Finderup

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05842772 (Feasibility Testing a shareD dEciSIon Making Intervention for People With Kidney failuRE), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05842772 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility Testing a shareD dEciSIon Making Intervention for People With Kidney failuRE (DESIRE), Their Relatives, and the Health Professionals in Kidney Services: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2023 to 2023Enrolled27ConditionsKidney Failure, End of LifeArmsShared decision making intervention for patients with kidney failure when planning end-of-life care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louise Engelbrecht BuurDepartment of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hilary Louise BekkerResearch Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Henning SøndergaardThe Danish Kidney Association, Taastrup, Denmark.
Michell KannegaardProfession School UCN act2learn, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jens Kristian MadsenDepartment of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Dinah Sherzad KhatirDepartment of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jeanette FinderupDepartment of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Kidney failure is associated with a high disease burden and high mortality rates. National and international guidelines recommend health professionals involve patients with kidney failure in making decisions about end-of-life care, but implementation of these conversations within kidney services varies. We developed the DESIRE (ShareD dEciSIon-making for patients with kidney failuRE to improve end-of-life care) intervention from our studies investigating multiple decision maker needs and experiences of end-of-life care in kidney services. The DESIRE intervention's three components are a training programme for health professionals, a patient decision aid, and a kidney service consultation held to facilitate shared decision-making conversations about planning end-of-life care. Objectives: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of integrating the DESIRE intervention within kidney services. Design: A pilot study using a multicentre randomised controlled design. Setting: Four Danish nephrology departments. Participants: Patients with kidney failure who were 75 years of age or above, their relatives, and health professionals. Methods: Patients were randomised to either the intervention or usual care. Feasibility data regarding delivering the intervention, the trial design, and outcome measures were collected through questionnaires and audio recordings at four points in time: before, during, post, and 3 months after the intervention. Acceptability data were collected through semi-structured interviews with patients and relatives, as well as a focus group with health professionals post the intervention. Results: Twenty-seven patients out of the 32 planned were randomised either to the intervention ( Conclusions: Participant feedback indicated that the DESIRE intervention can be integrated into practice to support patients, relatives, and health professionals in planning end-of-life care alongside the management of worsening kidney failure. Minimising exhaustion and enhancing engagement with the intervention should be a focus for subsequent refinement of the intervention. Registration: The study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier: NCT05842772. Date of first recruitment: March 20, 2023

Indexed as

Acceptability testingComplex interventionsEnd-of-life careFeasibility testingKidney failureKidney servicesNephrologyPalliative careRandomised controlled trialsShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID39221228
PMCPMC11363568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.