ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2024
Relationship between spinal alignment and functional disability after thoracolumbar spinal fractures: A systematic review.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intermediate screw placement improves initial radiographic alignment but not clinical outcomes following long-segment fixation for thoracolumbar fractures.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracolumbar spinal fractures (TLSF) can cause pain, neurological deficits, and functional disability. Operative treatments aim to preserve neurological function, improve functional status, and restore spinal alignment and stability. In this review, we evaluate the relationship between spinal alignment and functional impairment in patients with TLSF. Methods: We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to identify full-text articles that evaluate the correlation between spinal alignment and functional outcomes of TLSF. The artificial intelligence software Rayyan assisted the screening process. Functional outcomes referred to activity/disability, quality of life, and pain scores, as well as return to work metrics. Radiological assessments included were vertebral compression angle, Cobb and Gardner angles, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt. Statistical analyses were performed for the data provided by articles using the SPSS v24. Results: Of 1,616 articles reviewed, 6 were included for final analysis. Only 1 study primarily addressed the effects of spinopelvic parameters and functional outcomes. Four studies correlated Cobb angles with functional outcome, while 3 others compared vertebral compression angles with functional outcomes. Outcomes were assessed using work status or a combination of VAS pain and spine score, ODI, SF-36, and RMDQ-24. Neither the analysis done within the articles, nor the one made with the raw data provided by them, showed a significant correlation between the radiological measurements assessed at time of injury and final functional outcomes. Conclusions: A correlation between the assessed spinal radiological measurements assessed with the functional outcomes of TLSF was not found in this review. Further well-designed prospective studies are necessary to evaluate spinal alignment measurements in TLSF with functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.