Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39221087›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Wearables are a viable digital health tool for older Indigenous adults living remotely in Australia (research).

Connie Henson, Ben Freedman, Boe Rambaldini, Bronwyn Carlson, Carmen Parter, Chrishan J Nalliah, Felicity Chapman, Gina Shepherd, Jessica Orchard, John Skinner and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Connie HensonHeart Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7920-9821
Ben FreedmanHeart Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Boe RambaldiniHeart Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Bronwyn CarlsonDepartment of Indigenous Studies, Faculty of Arts, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Carmen ParterHeart Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Chrishan J NalliahFaculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Felicity ChapmanDjurali Centre for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia.
Gina ShepherdDjurali Centre for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia.
Jessica OrchardSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
John SkinnerHeart Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Josephine GwynnSydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Rona MacnivenIndigenous Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Robyn RamsdenRural Doctors Network, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0418-9280
Sophia Nala 'Ḵixsisa 'las SpeierFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Suud Mohamed NahdiNSW Health HNELHD.
Vita ChristieHeart Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Yansong Harry HuangCharles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Katrina D WardBrewarrina Aboriginal Medical Service, Brewarrina, New South Wales, Australia.
Kylie GwynneHeart Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Health programs for Indigenous people are most effective, acceptable, and sustainable when Indigenous perspectives are prioritized. Codesign builds on Indigenous people's creativity and propensity to experiment with new technologies and ensures research is designed and implemented in a culturally safe and respectful manner. Limited research has focused on older Indigenous people as partners in digital health. No research has focused on the acceptability and feasibility of older Indigenous people using wearables for heart health monitoring. This study provides insights into the acceptability and feasibility for ≥55-year-old Indigenous people living in remote locations to use wearables (watches and patches) to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) and high blood pressure. Methods: This mixed methods study was codesigned and coimplemented with the local Aboriginal Controlled Health Service in a remote area of New South Wales, Australia. It included active involvement and codesign with the participants. The devices used in this study included a Withings Scan watch and a Biobeat patch. Results: Despite challenging conditions (>36°C) and variable internet connectivity, 11 Indigenous older adults participated in a five-day wearables program in a remote location. Participants indicated that using digital health devices was acceptable and feasible for older Indigenous users. They described high levels of comfort, safety and convenience when using wearables (patches and watches) to detect AF. They were active participants in codesigning the program. Conclusion: Older Indigenous Australians are motivated to use wearable health devices. They are keen to participate in codesign innovative health tech programs to ensure new health technologies are acceptable to Indigenous people and feasible for remote locations.

Indexed as

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanderatrial fibrillationchronic diseasescodesigncultural health trackerscultural safetyDigital healthhealth disparitiesIndigenouswearables

Identifiers

PMID39221087
PMCPMC11363237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.