Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39221060›Full record

ArticleArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2024

Anatomical Ablation of the Atrioventricular Node.

Demosthenes G Katritsis, Konstantinos C Siontis, Sharad Agarwal, Stavros Stavrakis, Eleftherios Giazitzoglou, Hina Amin, Joseph E Marine, Justin T Tretter, Damian Sanchez-Quintana, Robert H Anderson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Anatomy of the Atrioventricular Node.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. The Atrioventricular Node Revisited.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Demosthenes G KatritsisHygeia Hospital Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos C SiontisDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, US.
Sharad AgarwalPapworth Hospital NHS Trust Cambridge, UK.
Stavros StavrakisCollege of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City, OK, US.
Eleftherios GiazitzoglouHygeia Hospital Athens, Greece.
Hina AminDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, US.
Joseph E MarineJohns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore, MD US.
Justin T TretterDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Children's, and the Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, OH, US.
Damian Sanchez-QuintanaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Extremadura Badajoz, Spain.
Robert H AndersonBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Hugh CalkinsJohns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore, MD US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atrioventricular (AV) conduction ablation has been achieved by targeting the area of penetration of the conduction axis as defined by recording a His bundle potential. Ablation of the His bundle may reduce the possibility of a robust junctional escape rhythm. It was hypothesised that specific AV nodal ablation is feasible and safe. Methods: The anatomical position of the AV node in relation to the site of penetration of the conduction axis was identified as described in dissections and histological sections of human hearts. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation was accomplished based on the anatomical criteria. Results: Specific anatomical ablation of the AV node was attempted in 72 patients. Successful AV nodal ablation was accomplished in 63 patients (87.5%), following 60 minutes (IQR 50-70 minutes) of procedure time, 3.4 minutes (IQR 2.4-5.5 minutes) of fluoroscopy time, and delivery of 4 (IQR 3-6) RF lesions. An escape rhythm was present in 45 patients (71%), and the QRS complex was similar to that before ablation in all 45 patients. Atropine was administered in six patients after the 10-min waiting period and did not result in restoration of conduction. In nine patients, AV conduction could not be interrupted, and AV block was achieved with ablation of the His after delivery of 12 (IQR 8-15) RF lesions. No cases of sudden death were encountered, and all patients had persistent AV block during a median 10.5 months (IQR 5-14 months) of follow-up. Conclusion: Anatomical ablation of the AV node is feasible and safe, and results in an escape rhythm similar to that before ablation.

Indexed as

ablationAtrioventricularHis bundlejunctionnodenon-penetrating bundle

Identifiers

PMID39221060
PMCPMC11363056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.