ArticleArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2024
Anatomical Ablation of the Atrioventricular Node.
Article in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arterial Supply to the Atrioventricular Node: Anatomical Variability and Clinical Implications.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
- Long-term Outcomes of Atrioventricular Node Ablation and Pacemaker Therapy for Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from a 10-year Nationwide Analysis.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Article
- Atrioventricular Junction Ablation with High-Definition Recording of Atrioventricular Node Potential.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Article
- The Anatomy of the Atrioventricular Node.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Determining Good Candidates for Atrioventricular Junction Ablation and Device Therapy and Which Device to Implant.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025Review
- The Atrioventricular Node Revisited.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrioventricular (AV) conduction ablation has been achieved by targeting the area of penetration of the conduction axis as defined by recording a His bundle potential. Ablation of the His bundle may reduce the possibility of a robust junctional escape rhythm. It was hypothesised that specific AV nodal ablation is feasible and safe. Methods: The anatomical position of the AV node in relation to the site of penetration of the conduction axis was identified as described in dissections and histological sections of human hearts. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation was accomplished based on the anatomical criteria. Results: Specific anatomical ablation of the AV node was attempted in 72 patients. Successful AV nodal ablation was accomplished in 63 patients (87.5%), following 60 minutes (IQR 50-70 minutes) of procedure time, 3.4 minutes (IQR 2.4-5.5 minutes) of fluoroscopy time, and delivery of 4 (IQR 3-6) RF lesions. An escape rhythm was present in 45 patients (71%), and the QRS complex was similar to that before ablation in all 45 patients. Atropine was administered in six patients after the 10-min waiting period and did not result in restoration of conduction. In nine patients, AV conduction could not be interrupted, and AV block was achieved with ablation of the His after delivery of 12 (IQR 8-15) RF lesions. No cases of sudden death were encountered, and all patients had persistent AV block during a median 10.5 months (IQR 5-14 months) of follow-up. Conclusion: Anatomical ablation of the AV node is feasible and safe, and results in an escape rhythm similar to that before ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.