Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39221045›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Comparison of Knotless Versus Knot-Tying Suture Anchors for Arthroscopic Repair of Hip Labral Tears.

Aytek Huseyin Celiksoz, Berhan Bayram, Tahir Koray Yozgatli, Edip Yilmaz, Ali Yassin, Asim Kayaalp, Baris Kocaoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aytek Huseyin CeliksozDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Eskisehir City Hospital, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Berhan BayramDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tahir Koray YozgatliDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Edip YilmazDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali YassinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Asim KayaalpDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cankaya Hospital for Orthopedic Care, Ankara, Turkey.
Baris KocaogluDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2537-0660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Both knotless and knot-tying anchors are commonly employed in the arthroscopic repair of hip labral tears. Purpose: To compare the midterm clinical results of arthroscopic hip labral repair using knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair between January 2017 and January 2021 and who had at least 2 years of follow-up were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the suture anchor type: a 2.9-mm knotless suture anchor (knotless group) or a 1.8-mm knot-tying suture anchor (knot-tying group). All patients underwent femoroplasty for cam lesions and acetabular rim trimming for pincer lesions. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were administered both preoperatively and postoperatively. The consistency of the outcome scores was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State. The statistical significance between groups was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test and quantile-based analysis of variance. Results: A total of 413 patients were included: 256 patients in the knotless group (median age, 35 years [interquartile range, 31-38 years]; median follow-up, 34 months) and 157 patients in the knot-tying group (median age, 34 years [interquartile range, 30-38 years]; median follow-up, 25 months). There were no significant differences in postoperative mHHS, HOS-ADL, or iHOT-12 scores between the 2 groups. However, there were significant differences, favoring the knotless group over the knot-tying group, in postoperative HOS-SSS (87 ± 2 vs 86 ± 1, respectively) and VAS pain (1 vs 2, respectively) scores ( Conclusion: In this study, patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair with knotless suture anchors had slightly better postoperative HOS-SSS and VAS pain scores and a lower incidence of postoperative synovitis compared with patients who underwent repair with knot-tying suture anchors.

Indexed as

clinical outcomesfemoroacetabular impingement syndromehip arthroscopic surgeryhip labral tearsknotless anchorsknot-tying anchors

Identifiers

PMID39221045
PMCPMC11363226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.