ArticleApplied physics reviews2024
A smartphone-based approach for comprehensive soil microbiome profiling.
Article in Applied physics reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The soil microbiome is crucial for nutrient cycling, health, and plant growth. This study presents a smartphone-based approach as a low-cost and portable alternative to traditional methods for classifying bacterial species and characterizing microbial communities in soil samples. By harnessing bacterial autofluorescence detection and machine learning algorithms, the platform achieved an average accuracy of 88% in distinguishing common soil-related bacterial species despite the lack of biomarkers, nucleic acid amplification, or gene sequencing. Furthermore, it successfully identified dominant species within various bacterial mixtures with an accuracy of 76% and three-level soil health identification at an accuracy of 80%-82%, providing insights into microbial community dynamics. The influence of other soil conditions (pH and moisture) was relatively minor, showcasing the platform's robustness. Various field soil samples were also tested with this platform at 80% accuracy compared with the laboratory analyses, demonstrating the practicality and usability of this approach for on-site soil analysis. This study highlights the potential of the smartphone-based system as a valuable tool for soil assessment, microbial monitoring, and environmental management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.