ReviewMethodsX2024
Valorization of fishery industry waste: Chitosan extraction and its application in the industry.
Review in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing microwave irradiation for the facile preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Chitosan Derivatives: Challenges and Opportunities in the Green and Sustainable Transition Era.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative Review of Microbial Chitosanases: Properties, Structures, Hydrolytic Modes and Applications.Current microbiology · 2026Review
- Production method for electrospun chitosan-based membranes.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Waste from the fishing industry is disposed of in soils and oceans, causing environmental damage. However, it is also a source of valuable compounds such as chitin. Although chitin is the second most abundant polymer in nature, its use in industry is limited due to the lack of standardized and scalable extraction methods and its poor solubility. The deacetylation process increases its potential applications by enabling the recovery of chitosan, which is soluble in dilute acidic solutions. Chitosan is a polymer of great importance due to its biocompatible and bioactive properties, which include antimicrobial and antioxidant capabilities. Chitin extraction and its deacetylation to obtain chitosan are typically performed using chemical processes that involve large amounts of strongly acidic and alkaline solutions. To reduce the environmental impact of this process, extraction methods based on biotechnological tools, such as fermentation and chitin deacetylase, as well as emerging technologies, have been proposed. These extraction methods have demonstrated the potential to reduce or even avoid using strong solvents and shorten extraction time, thereby reducing costs. Nevertheless, it is important to address existing gaps in this area, such as the requirements for large-scale implementation and the determination of the stoichiometric ratios for each process. This review highlights the use of biotechnological tools and emerging technologies for chitin extraction and chitosan production. These approaches truly minimize environmental impact, reduce the use of strong solvents, and shorten extraction time. They are a reliable alternative to fishery waste valorization, lowering costs; however, addressing the critical gaps for their large-scale implementation remains challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.