ArticleHeliyon2024
Synaptic ring attractor: A unified framework for attractor dynamics and multiple cues integration.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep reinforcement learning account of competition and integration of visual and goal vector signals for spatial navigation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Modeling the journey as well as the destination: a control theory account of rotational navigation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Continuous attractor dynamics in spatial navigation: from population geometry to flexible computation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective cue integration is essential for an animal's survival. The ring attractor network has emerged as a powerful framework for understanding how animals seamlessly integrate various cues. This network not only elucidates neural dynamics within the brain, especially in spatial encoding systems like the heading direction (HD) system, but also sheds light on cue integration within decision-making processes. Yet, many significant phenomena across different fields lack clear explanations. For instance, in physiology, the integration mechanism of Drosophila's compass neuron when confronted with conflicting self-motion cues and external sensory cues with varying gain control settings is not well elucidated. Similarly, in ethology, the decision-making system shows Bayesian integration (BI) under minimal cue conflicts, but shifts to a winner-take-all (WTA) mode as conflicts surpass a certain threshold. To address these gaps, we introduce a ring attractor network with asymmetrical neural connections and synaptic dynamics in this paper. A thorough series of simulations has been conducted to assess its ability to track external cues and integrate conflicting cues. The results from these simulations demonstrate that the proposed model replicates observed neural dynamics and offers a framework for modeling biologically plausible cue integration behaviors. Furthermore, our findings yield several testable predictions that could inform future neuroethological research, providing insights into the role of ring attractor dynamics in the animal brain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.