Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220964›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

An Auto-Reading probe system for detecting deletion mutations In liquid biopsy with direct quantification of mutation abundance.

Bang Zhu, Jingcong Zhou, Hong He, Yangwei Liao, Qiaolin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bang ZhuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434023, China.
Jingcong ZhouDepartment of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China.
Hong HeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434023, China.
Yangwei LiaoDepartment of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China.
Qiaolin LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434023, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deletion mutations have been confirmed to be closely related to the occurrence and progression of different hereditary diseases and tumors. Specifically, the deletion of a small number of bases is more challenging to be captured and differentiated. In non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and liquid biopsy targeting circulating tumor DNA, obtaining accurate mutation abundance in targeted DNA is a crucial step in the detection process. However, the quantification of mutation abundance with existing methods is not accurate enough. Results: Herein, we developed the " Auto-Reading" probe detection system based on our previous work. Through theoretical modeling and experimental calculations, we verified the successful application of our system in NIPT and early cancer diagnosis, enabling effective discrimination of different mutant abundances. Significance: Our method overcomes the interference of reaction concentrations on signal detection, allowing direct quantification of mutation abundance without the need for purification of PCR products. The detection system is cost-effective and feasible for laboratory use. We believe the system will facilitate broad applications in mutation detection.

Indexed as

Deletion mutationDNA displacement reactionLiquid biopsyNIPTNucleic acid probe

Identifiers

PMID39220964
PMCPMC11365318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.