ArticleHeliyon2024
Clinical diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with acute infection in emergency department.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- An NGS-assisted diagnostic workflow for culture-independent detection of bloodstream pathogens and prediction of antimicrobial resistances in sepsis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Trial
- Improved Etiological Diagnosis of Nonresolving or Slowly Resolving Pneumonia Through Combined Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy and Metagenomic Sequencing.Canadian respiratory journal · 2025Trial
- Review
- Contrasting the gut microbiome in Colombian patients with diarrhea: a comparative metagenomic study in hospitalization and emergency room services.Gut pathogens · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in infants with severe infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and culture in microbial diagnosis of patients with acute infection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 206 specimens from 163 patients who were admitted to the emergency department of The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between July 2020, and July 2021. We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of mNGS and in-hospital traditional culture. Results: The total positive rate of mNGS was significantly higher than that culture methods (71.4 % vs 40.8 %, Conclusion: Compared to culture methods, mNGS demonstrates superior positive rates, sensitivity, and accuracy in the rapid detection of acute infections, particularly in critically ill patients such as those with sepsis. This capability establishes a foundation for the swift and precise identification of pathogens, allowing for the analysis of clinical indicators and patient prognosis based on the extensive data generated from mNGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.