ReviewJDS communications2024
The history and future of the cornual nerve block for calf disbudding.
Review in JDS communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Policresulen for Disbudding Dairy Calves: A Two-Part Study on Calf Welfare and Consumer Perceptions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Attitudes Towards Animals and Calf Disbudding Techniques: A Mixed Methods Study Using the Animal Attitude Scale (AAS-10).Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Welfare of beef cattle.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Procaine, With and Without Epinephrine, Compared to Lidocaine in Local Anesthesia for Calves Before Thermocautery Disbudding.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Pilot testing an ethanol cornual nerve block as a long-term analgesic for calf disbudding.JDS communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disbudding damages the germinal horn bud cells and prevents subsequent horn growth in young calves. Hot-iron cautery or caustic paste are the most common disbudding techniques and are unequivocally painful procedures. An important technique in controlling the acute pain experienced during disbudding is the cornual nerve block (CNB) that uses a local anesthetic agent and targets a branch of the trigeminal cranial nerve, the zygomaticotemporal nerve, as it travels along the temporal groove of the skull. Though CNB have been used since 1932, practitioners have reported variability in achieving full desensitization of the horn bud region since its inception. This failure may have led to the establishment of variations in the CNB technique, without consensus on a reliable and repeatable approach. Reasons for CNB failures may include technical errors by the practitioner, such as an injection into subcutaneous or deep muscle bodies; biologically important path variations in the zygomaticotemporal nerve and its cornual branches; and secondary innervation of the horn bud region, particularly the cornual branches of the infratrochlear nerve. Further investigation into documenting and understanding CNB failure and alternatives, such as regional perfusion, is warranted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.