Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220844›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2024

Predicting respiration rate in unrestrained dairy cows using image analysis and fast Fourier transform.

Raphael R Mantovani, Guilherme L Menezes, João R R Dórea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raphael R MantovaniDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
Guilherme L MenezesDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
João R R DóreaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory rate (RR) is commonly employed for identifying animals experiencing heat-stress conditions and respiratory diseases. Recent advancements in computer vision algorithms have enabled the estimation of the RR in dairy cows through image-based approaches, with a primary focus on standing positions, thermal imaging, and deep learning techniques. In this study, our objective was to develop a system capable of accurately predicting the RR of lying Holstein cows under unrestrained conditions using red, green, and blue (RGB) and infrared (IR) night vision images. Thirty lactating cows were continuously recorded for 12 h per day over a 3-d period, capturing at least one 30-s video segment of each cow during lying time. A total of 95 videos were manually annotated with rectangular bounding boxes encompassing the flank area (region of interest; ROI) of the lying cows. For future applications, we trained a model for ROI identification using YOLOv8 to avoid manual annotations. The observed RR was determined by visual counting of breaths in each video. To predict the RR, we devised an image processing pipeline involving (1) capturing the ROI for the entire video, (2) reshaping the pixel intensity of each image channel into a 2-dimensional object and calculating its per-frame mean, (3) applying fast Fourier transform (FFT) to the average pixel intensity vector, (4) filtering frequencies specifically associated with respiratory movements, and (5) executing inverse FFT on the denoized data and identifying peaks on the resulting plot, with the count of peaks serving as the predicted RR per minute. The evaluation metrics, root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) and R

Identifiers

PMID39220844
PMCPMC11365218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.