Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220821›Full record

ArticleResearch in social stratification and mobility2024

Interaction of family SES with children's genetic propensity for cognitive and noncognitive skills: No evidence of the Scarr-Rowe hypothesis for educational outcomes.

Gaia Ghirardi, Carlos J Gil-Hernández, Fabrizio Bernardi, Elsje van Bergen, Perline Demange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social stratification and mobility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaia GhirardiDepartment of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute (EUI), Florence, Italy.
Carlos J Gil-HernándezEuropean Commission, Centre for Advanced Studies, Joint Research Centre, Sevilla, Spain.
Fabrizio BernardiDepartment of Sociology II, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
Elsje van BergenDepartment of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Perline DemangeDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the role of genes and environments in predicting educational outcomes. We test the Scarr-Rowe hypothesis, suggesting that enriched environments enable genetic potential to unfold, and the compensatory advantage hypothesis, proposing that low genetic endowments have less impact on education for children from high socioeconomic status (SES) families. We use a pre-registered design with

Indexed as

Between-family analysisCompensatory advantage hypothesisEducational inequalityGene-environment (G × E) interactionNetherlands Twin RegisterScarr-Rowe hypothesisTrio analysisWithin-family analysis

Identifiers

PMID39220821
PMCPMC11364161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.