Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220650›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor: a retrospective analysis of 36 cases.

Min Ji, Yuchen Zhang, Shuaibing Liu, Menghui Zhang, Bingbing Qiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Misdiagnosis of a giant hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor: A case report].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min JiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuchen ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shuaibing LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Menghui ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Bingbing QiaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is a rare type of mesenchymal neoplasm and lacks systematic reports. The aim was to analyze the features of hepatic PEComa in order to provide our own experience for diagnosis and management from a single center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data, imaging findings, pathology, treatments and prognosis of 36 patients with hepatic PEComa in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2016 to September 2023. Results: 29 females and 7 males (median age, 47.8 years) were included in this study. The majority (26/36, 72.2%) of patients were diagnosed incidentally with non-specific symptoms. Abnormal enhancement of enlarged blood vessels (27/36,75%) can be observed on CT/MRI and only 7 patients (19.4%) were correctly diagnosed by imaging examinations. The positive immunohistochemical expressions were HMB-45(35/36,97.2%), Melan-A (34/35,97.1%), SMA (23/26,88.5%) and CD34(86.7%,26/30). Treatments include resection (24/36,67.7%), radiofrequency ablation (6/36,16.7%), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(1/36,2.7%), conservative clinical follow-up(2/36,5.6%), and sirolimus-chemotherapy (3/36,8.3%). During the follow-up period (range, 2-81 months), except for one patient with a single intrahepatic recurrence and 3 malignant patients died in 6 months, the remaining patients had no signs of recurrence and metastasis. Conclusions: Hepatic PEComa has no specific clinical features and mainly depends on clinicopathological characteristics for accurate diagnosis. Resection is the best treatment for benign PEComa, but TACE and radiofrequency ablation can also be considered in case of contraindications for surgery.

Indexed as

abdominal tumordiagnosisliverPEComatreatment

Identifiers

PMID39220650
PMCPMC11361986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.