ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2024
Characterizing Low-cost Registration for Photographic Images to Computed Tomography.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mapping information from photographic images to volumetric medical imaging scans is essential for linking spaces with physical environments, such as in image-guided surgery. Current methods of accurate photographic image to computed tomography (CT) image mapping can be computationally intensive and/or require specialized hardware. For general purpose 3-D mapping of bulk specimens in histological processing, a cost-effective solution is necessary. Here, we compare the integration of a commercial 3-D camera and cell phone imaging with a surface registration pipeline. Using surgical implants and chuck-eye steak as phantom tests, we obtain 3-D CT reconstruction and sets of photographic images from two sources: Canfield Imaging's H1 camera and an iPhone 14 Pro. We perform surface reconstruction from the photographic images using commercial tools and open-source code for Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) respectively. We complete surface registration of the reconstructed surfaces with the iterative closest point (ICP) method. Manually placed landmarks were identified at three locations on each of the surfaces. Registration of the Canfield surfaces for three objects yields landmark distance errors of 1.747, 3.932, and 1.692 mm, while registration of the respective iPhone camera surfaces yields errors of 1.222, 2.061, and 5.155 mm. Photographic imaging of an organ sample prior to tissue sectioning provides a low-cost alternative to establish correspondence between histological samples and 3-D anatomical samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.