Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220547›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Structure-Based Computational Scanning of Chemical Modification Sites in Biologics.

Nidhin Thomas, Tanmoy Sanyal, Per Greisen, Kristine Deibler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nidhin ThomasDigital Science and Innovation, Novo Nordisk Research Center Seattle Inc., Seattle, Washington 98101, United States.
Tanmoy SanyalDigital Science and Innovation, Novo Nordisk Research Center Seattle Inc., Seattle, Washington 98101, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6009-9431
Per GreisenDigital Science and Innovation, Novo Nordisk Research Center Seattle Inc., Seattle, Washington 98101, United States.
Kristine DeiblerDigital Science and Innovation, Novo Nordisk Research Center Seattle Inc., Seattle, Washington 98101, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2376-8456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the challenges of short half-life, immunogenicity, and nonspecific distribution, chemical modifications of peptide and protein-based drugs have emerged as a versatile strategy for improving their therapeutic efficacy. One such modification involves the derivatization of peptides and proteins with fatty acids, which can protract their half-life, modify their biodistribution, and potentially enable targeted delivery to specific tissues or disease sites of interest. However, the present strategies for the synthesis of such synthetically modified biologics require numerous rounds of experimental testing and often yield unstable, inactive, or heterogeneous products. To address the inefficiencies in designing modified biologics, we developed a hybrid computational workflow that integrates RosettaMatch from the Rosetta suite of protein modeling tools with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. This approach not only reduces the number of amino acid positions that need to be experimentally tested by targeting only the most promising candidates for modification but also expedites the design of chemically modified biologics with the desired properties, ensuring a rapid and cost-effective development cycle. Although we demonstrate the utility of our method on a peptide therapeutic, GLP-1, with different fatty acid derivatizations, this straightforward approach has the potential to streamline the design process of a diverse range of chemically modified therapeutics, enabling tailored enhancements to their pharmacokinetic properties.

Identifiers

PMID39220547
PMCPMC11360052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.