ArticleACS omega2024
Synthetic Clay Application to Reduce the Segregation of Barite-Based Oil-Well Cement.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Weighting Material in Drilling Fluids: Sagging Mechanisms, Influencing Factors, and Prevention Strategies.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Utilizing Saudi volcanic scoria in lightweight geopolymer for enhanced wellbore cementing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the oil and gas industry, cement segregation is a significant concern that can have disastrous consequences, such as the failure of cement. The change of hardened cement's properties is observed, resulting in a decrease in its strength and an increase in its permeability. Therefore, providing some solutions to prevent this is crucial. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of synthetic clay in mitigating the problem of segregation in cement having barite. Six concentrations of synthetic clay were used to prepare six heavy-weighted cement samples with a high density of 18 lb/gal using the barite weighting material. The approaches of density distribution and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were employed to characterize the heterogeneity in the hardened cement samples with the aim of identifying the potential of cement segregation. Then, the optimum concentration of the synthetic clay was selected and its effects on the rheological, strength, petrophysical, and elastic properties were evaluated and compared with the properties of the base cement (without synthetic clay). The results showed that 0.4% by weight of cement (BWOC) synthetic clay was the optimum concentration, which yielded the minimum cement segregation as represented by a 61% reduction in the density variation compared to the control specimen. The results obtained from the NMR technique validated the findings of the density distribution method, indicating that the porosity distribution of the synthetic clay cement with a concentration of 0.4% BWOC exhibited uniformity across its top, middle, and bottom sections, with a slight deviation window, while the porosity distribution of the control cement specimen displayed noticeable variation. Moreover, the synthetic clay had better properties than the control cement specimen. For example, the rheological properties were improved as represented by a 22% reduction in plastic viscosity and 42 and 11% increase in the yield point and gel strength, respectively. Compared to the base cement, the compressive and tensile strength were increased by 39 and 43%. The synthetic clay decreased the permeability and porosity by 73 and 24%, respectively. The synthetic clay enhanced the elastic properties as represented by a 1.5% reduction in Young's modulus and a 1.3% increase in Poisson's ratio compared to the base cement sample.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.