Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220433›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Prenatal cell-free DNA testing of women with pregnancy-associated cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Catharina J Heesterbeek, Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen, Joosje H Heimovaara, Liesbeth Lenaerts, Christianne Lok, Ingeborg J H Vriens, Diane Van Opstal, Elles M J Boon, Daoud Sie, Christine E M de Die-Smulders and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Drop of Blood to Lead the Way.Hematology reports · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Catharina J HeesterbeekDepartment of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Vivianne C G Tjan-HeijnenDepartment of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Joosje H HeimovaaraDepartment of Gynaecology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Liesbeth LenaertsDepartment of Oncology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Christianne LokDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ingeborg J H VriensDepartment of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Diane Van OpstalDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Elles M J BoonDepartment of Human Genetics, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Daoud SieDepartment of Human Genetics, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Christine E M de Die-SmuldersDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Frédéric AmantDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Merryn V E MacvilleDepartment of Clinical Genetics, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Dutch NIPT Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Incidentally, the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) shows chromosomal aberrations suspicious of a maternal malignancy, especially after genome-wide testing. The aim of this study is to determine how many cases of cancer in pregnancy are diagnosed or missed with NIPT and whether in retrospect subtle changes in NIPT results could have detected cancer. Methods: We identified Dutch patients diagnosed in 2017-2021 with pregnancy-associated cancer from the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) Registry, who underwent NIPT in the Dutch NIPT implementation study (TRIDENT-2). We retrospectively assessed how many of these women showed a malignancy suspicious-NIPT, their tumour types and -stages, and the time interval between NIPT and cancer diagnosis. Findings: Of 143 women with pregnancy-associated cancer, we included 65 patients that underwent an NIPT. Fifty-four women had a solid tumour and 11 a haematological malignancy. Sixteen (24.6%) NIPTs were malignancy suspicious (15 genome-wide, one targeted). All 10 haematological cancer patients with genome-wide NIPT had a malignancy suspicious-NIPT, irrespective of the disease stage. Only five patients with a solid tumour had a genome-wide malignancy suspicious-NIPT (4/5 advanced cancer stage III or IV). The mean time between date of NIPT and cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter after a malignancy suspicious-NIPT compared to a non-suspicious-NIPT, respectively 49.9 days (± SD 31.8) and 100.7 days (± SD 74.9), p = 0.001. Interpretation: All genome-wide NIPT in women with pregnancy-associated haematological malignancies were malignancy suspicious. Women with a solid tumour showed a malignancy suspicious-NIPT in only a minority of cases, mainly the advanced stages. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Noninvasive prenatal testPregnancy-associated cancer

Identifiers

PMID39220433
PMCPMC11363838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.