ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2024
Case Report: Rescue of Relapsed Pain in a Patient with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type II by Adding Another Dorsal Root Ganglion Lead.
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present on a patient with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) following ankle surgery. Pain was refractory to both conservative and surgical measures including neurotomies, ankle fusion, hardware removal, and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial. A dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation trial with lead placements at L4, L5, and S1 provided significant pain and functional improvement. However, during the implantation, we were able to place only two DRG leads at L4 and L5 and not S1 due to difficulties with advancing the lead to the desired location. Nonetheless, the two DRG leads provided 90% pain relief and 75% functional improvement for 9 months. However, the patient experienced pain symptoms similar to that of pre-implant without a clear trigger after 9 months despite no DRG stimulator hardware malfunction or lead migration. A decision was made to re-try implanting the S1 DRG lead, which was successful and provided significant pain relief.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.