Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220361›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2024

Are natural estrogens used in contraception at lower risk of venous thromboembolism than synthetic ones? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Jonathan Douxfils, Lucie Raskin, Marie Didembourg, Nathalie Donis, Jean-Michel Dogné, Laure Morimont, Charlotte Beaudart

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Body-identical estrogens in combined hormonal contraceptives: A safer path forward.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Combined Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Thrombosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chapter 3. Impact of estrogens on hemostasis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Position Statement on Cardiometabolic Health Across the Woman's Life Course - 2025.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Reassessing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Events in Women.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan DouxfilsQualiblood sa, QUALIresearch, Namur, Belgium.
Lucie RaskinDepartment of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Research Unit, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Marie DidembourgQualiblood sa, QUALIresearch, Namur, Belgium.
Nathalie DonisQualiblood sa, QUALIresearch, Namur, Belgium.
Jean-Michel DognéDepartment of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Research Unit, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Laure MorimontQualiblood sa, QUALIresearch, Namur, Belgium.
Charlotte BeaudartDepartment of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Research Unit, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant global health challenge, notably exacerbated by the use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs). Evidence mainly focuses on the type of progestogen used in COCs to establish the increased risk of VTE with less data assessed on the type of estrogen used. This meta-analysis aims to assess the risk of VTE associated with COCs containing synthetic estrogens like ethinylestradiol (EE) versus natural estrogens like estradiol (E2). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature searches were performed in December 2023 in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify clinical studies comparing the VTE risk between COCs containing synthetic versus natural estrogens. Studies were selected through rigorous screening, and data extraction followed standardized protocols, with statistical analyses employing a random effects model. Results: The search yielded five relevant studies, involving over 560,000 women/time, demonstrating a significant 33% reduction in VTE risk among users of natural estrogen-based COCs compared to synthetic estrogen-based COCs (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.87). Stratification analyses using adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of the main observationnal studies showed a 49% reduced VTE risk of E2-based pills compared to EE in association with levonorgestrel. Discussion and conclusion: Despite the longstanding use of EE-based COCs, emerging evidence supports a lower thrombotic risk associated with natural estrogens. This meta-analysis substantiates the lower VTE risk associated with natural estrogen-based COCs compared to synthetic alternatives, advocating for a re-evaluation of contraceptive guidelines to prioritize patient safety and reduce thrombotic risks.

Indexed as

EstrogensVenous ThromboembolismContraceptionContraceptives, Oral, CombinedEthinyl EstradiolFemaleHumansRisk FactorsContraceptives, Oral, CombinedEstrogensEthinyl Estradiolcombined oral contraceptiveestradiolethinylestradiolmeta-analysisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID39220361
PMCPMC11362054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.