Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220343›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2024

Ohnut vs waitlist control for the self-management of endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Kate Wahl, Natasha L Orr, Gurkiran Parmar, Sandy X J Zhang, Rebecca G K MacLeod, Heather Noga, Arianne Albert, Ryan Flannigan, Lori A Brotto, Paul J Yong

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04370444 (Pathways for Patient-centered Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis-associated Deep Dyspareunia), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04370444 nacompletednot on this map

Pathways for Patient-centered Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis-associated Deep Dyspareunia: A Pilot Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBC Women's Hospital & Health CentreRan2021 to 2021Enrolled30ConditionsEndometriosis-related Pain, Dyspareunia DeepArmsPhallus Length Reducer, Self-assessment of dyspareunia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kate WahlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2K8, Canada.
Natasha L OrrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2K8, Canada.
Gurkiran ParmarBC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis and UBC Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Lab, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.
Sandy X J ZhangBC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis and UBC Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Lab, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.
Rebecca G K MacLeodBC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis and UBC Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Lab, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.
Heather NogaBC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis and UBC Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Lab, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.
Arianne AlbertWomen's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.
Ryan FlanniganDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Lori A BrottoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2K8, Canada.
Paul J YongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2K8, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5521-3052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep dyspareunia affects 50% of people with endometriosis. The Ohnut is a set of interlocking rings that fit over the penis/insertive object. One or more rings can be used to limit insertion depth and reduce deep dyspareunia. Aim: We conducted a pilot, parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the feasibility of the study design and the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the Ohnut. Method: Participants were recruited from a tertiary center for endometriosis. Eligibility criteria were surgically confirmed endometriosis, age 19-49 years, monogamous sexual relationship with a partner willing to participate in the study, and no comorbid superficial dyspareunia, anxiety, or depression. Couples were randomized into an intervention group or a waitlist control group using a 1:1 allocation ratio. All couples had sex as normal during weeks 1 to 4 (baseline period), and couples in the intervention group used the Ohnut with sex during weeks 5 to 10 (intervention period) while controls had sex as normal. Patient participants used daily diaries to record sexual activity and deep dyspareunia score (0-10) for the 10-week study. Intervention group participants completed an acceptability questionnaire at the end of the study. Outcomes: The primary outcomes were feasibility of the study and acceptability of the Ohnut. We also assessed differences in deep dyspareunia scores in the participants who used the Ohnut compared to the control participants who did not. Results: We recruited approximately 5 couples per month of active recruitment. Of 864 potentially eligible participants, we successfully contacted 44.7% (n = 386), of whom 8.0% (n = 31) consented, 64.8% (n = 250) were ineligible, and 27.2% (n = 105) declined. Thirty-one couples were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group, and 17 couples completed the study. Intervention group couples used the Ohnut for an average of 72.4% (32.7%) of sexual encounters during the intervention period. The mean acceptability index score for the Ohnut was 0.83 (0.078) among patients and 0.83 (0.049) among partners (index between 0 and 1). After controlling for baseline deep dyspareunia, there was a significant difference in the intervention period mean deep dyspareunia scores between the control and intervention group (4.69 (2.44) vs 2.46 (1.82), Clinical Implications: We identified preliminary evidence for the acceptability and efficacy of the Ohnut among both patients and partners, suggesting that the Ohnut may be a useful stand-alone or adjuvant management tool for endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia. Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of this study were the "real-world" use of the Ohnut and data collection from both patients and partners. Limitations of the study design included the strict eligibility criteria that affected feasibility and generalizability. Conclusion: This pilot RCT indicated that the Ohnut may be an acceptable and effective intervention to reduce endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia. We identified opportunities to improve design for a larger RCT. Clinical Trial Registration: This clinical trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT04370444).

Indexed as

deep dyspareuniaendometriosisfeasibility studyOhnutpatient acceptance of health carepilot projectrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID39220343
PMCPMC11365696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.