ArticleIranian journal of biotechnology2024
Article in Iranian journal of biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Silico Functional and Structural Analysis ofGenes · 2026Article
- Identification and Association ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Objective: To propose a simple and relatively fast method for the prediction of variant pathogenicity using free online Materials and Methods: We aim to propose a methodology to predict variants with high pathogenic potential using computational analysis, using Results: Out of the 209 analyzed variants, 16 were considered pathogenic, and 13 were located in the catalytic domain. The most frequent protein changes were size and hydrophobicity modifications of amino acids. Proline and Glycine amino acid substitutions were the most frequent changes predicted as pathogenic. These bioinformatic tools predicted functional changes, such as protein up or down-regulation, gain or loss of molecule interactions, and structural protein modifications. When compared to the ACMG classification, 10 out of 16 variants were considered likely pathogenic, with 7 out of 10 changes at Proline/Glycine substitutions. Conclusion: This method allows quick and cost-free bulk variant screening to identify variants with pathogenic potential for further association and/or functional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.