ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Glioma-related epilepsy following low-grade glioma surgery.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating machine learning and retrospective cohort to explore the effects of AEDs on the prognosis of LGG and identify related molecular targets.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Asleep motor mapping in resected low-grade gliomas -a population based multicenter study.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Mapping glioma electromagnetic waves and temperature as a surgical strategy to resect a diffusely infiltrative glioma.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Review
- Research progress in glioma-related epilepsy (Review).Biomedical reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epileptic seizures commonly burden low-grade glioma (LGG) patients and negatively impact quality of life, neurocognition, and general patient health. Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) are used to manage seizures but can result in undesired side effects. Our aim was to report our experience in epilepsy in one of the largest case series of LGG patients (reclassified in accordance with the WHO 2021 classification). Furthermore, we evaluate our postoperative seizure frequency difference between LGG patients who use preoperative ASMs and ones with no ASMs. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from Salford Royal Hospital electronic records and Neuro-Oncology database from 2006 to 2022. Descriptive statistics were performed for demographic analysis, while multivariable analysis was used to determine postoperative seizure-free outcomes. Results: In total, 257 operations were performed on 206 patients. Postoperatively, 114 patients suffered from seizures, and approximately 45.2% of patients developed seizures at 3-12 months postsurgery, with the odds higher in patients on preoperative ASMs. There was no evidence to suggest a higher postoperative seizure rate in patients undergoing awake craniotomy versus general anesthetic. The extent of resection (EOR) was inversely related to seizure failure, with gross-total resection showing a statistically significant reduction in seizures in comparison to all other surgical resections. Conclusions: In our experience, there is no evidence to suggest a reduced postoperative seizure outcome when prescribing preoperative ASMs. EOR is an independent prognosticator for postoperative seizure failure with all other variables demonstrating nonsignificance. Overall, a larger study can investigate the role of ASMs in LGG in greater detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.