Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220227›Full record

ArticleCritical care research and practice2024

The Impact of the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit on Quaternary Care Accessibility for Rural Patients: A Comparative Analysis.

Quincy K Tran, Anastasia Ternovskaia, Jessica V Downing, Minahil Cheema, Taylor Kowansky, Isha Vashee, Jasjot Sayal, Jasmine Wu, Aditi Singh, Daniel J Haase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Quincy K TranDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7774-154X
Anastasia TernovskaiaThe Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Department of Emergency Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jessica V DowningDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9755-252X
Minahil CheemaUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Taylor KowanskyThe Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Department of Emergency Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1898-7261
Isha VasheeThe Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Department of Emergency Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jasjot SayalThe Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Department of Emergency Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jasmine WuThe R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Aditi SinghThe Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Department of Emergency Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniel J HaaseDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8950-1933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous research suggests that patients from rural areas who are critically ill with complex medical needs or require time-sensitive subspecialty interventions face worse healthcare outcomes and delays in care when compared to those from urban areas. The critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU) at our quaternary care center was established to expedite the transfer of critically ill patients or those who need time-sensitive intervention. This study investigates if disparities exist in treatments and outcomes among patients transferred to the CCRU from rural versus urban hospitals. Methods: This is a retrospective study of adult, nontrauma patients admitted to the CCRU via interhospital transfer from outside facilities from January 1 to December 31, 2018. Patients transferred from within our institution or with missing clinical data were excluded. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to measure the association between patients' demographic and clinical factors with in-hospital mortality. Results: We analyzed 1381 nontrauma patients, and 484 (35%) were from rural areas. Median age was 59 [47-69], and 629 (46%) were female. Median sequential organ failure assessment was 3 ([1-6], Conclusion: Thirty-five percent of patients transferred to the CCRU came from rural areas, which house 25% of the state population of Maryland. Patients transferred from rural counties to the CCRU faced greater transport distances, but they received the same level of care upon arrival at the CCRU and had the same odds of in-hospital mortality as patients transferred from urban hospitals.

Identifiers

PMID39220227
PMCPMC11362575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.