Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220219›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2024

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Attitudes to Organ Donation in Central Australia: A Qualitative Pilot Study.

Paul Secombe, Emslie Lankin, Rosalind Beadle, Greg McAnulty, Alex Brown, Michael Bailey, Rebecca Schultz, David Pilcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul SecombeIntensive Care Unit, Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs (Mparntwe), NT, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1137-0512
Emslie LankinIntensive Care Unit, Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs (Mparntwe), NT, Australia.
Rosalind BeadleCentre for Remote Health, Flinders University, Alice Springs (Mparntwe), NT, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4884-5275
Greg McAnultyIntensive Care Unit, Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs (Mparntwe), NT, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-8453
Alex BrownNational Centre For Indigenous Genomics, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2112-3918
Michael BaileySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5551-1401
Rebecca SchultzPublic and Primary Health Care, Alice Springs (Mparntwe), NT, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5589-9680
David PilcherSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8939-7985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Organ transplantation is a well-established intervention but is reliant on the donation of organs and tissues, mostly from deceased donors. The proportion of Australians proceeding to organ donation (OD) has increased, but the proportion of Indigenous Australians proceeding remains two-thirds that of non-Indigenous Australians. We sought to explore perceived barriers and enablers for the involvement of Indigenous peoples in the OD process. Methods: Qualitative methodology centered around focus groups was used to capture the experiences and perspectives of Indigenous people regarding OD. A purposively sampled group of Aboriginal Liaison Officers working within the Alice Springs Hospital Intensive Care Unit (ASH ICU) participated in up to 6 focus groups during 2021 with subsequent thematic analysis of the enablers and barriers to Indigenous participation in the OD process. The ASH ICU is the only ICU servicing Central Australia, and 70% of admissions are Indigenous patients. Results: Four primary themes emerged: OD is a new and culturally taboo topic; conversations related to OD are confronting; education is needed (both about OD and cultural education for clinicians); and lack of trust in the healthcare system. Conclusions: There are cultural barriers to engaging in the OD process and clinicians need more training on the delivery of culturally safe communication is needed. Despite this, there was a recognition that OD is important. Education about OD needs to be place based, culturally and linguistically appropriate, informed by local knowledge, delivered in community, and occur before a family member is admitted to ICU.

Identifiers

PMID39220219
PMCPMC11365648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.