ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2024
Evidence-based summary of the prevention and management of radiation dermatitis in patients with breast cancer.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Summary of the best evidence for the management of kinesiophobia in patients after cardiac surgery.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding radiation dermatitis among radiotherapy patients across Shanxi: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology for the Treatment of Radiation Dermatitis: Advances and Translational Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Up to now there is a lack of research to summarize the relevant evidence for radiation dermatitis (RD) management in patients with breast cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to summarize the best evidence for the prevention and management of RD in patients with breast cancer. Methods: According to the "6S" evidence pyramid model, all major databases were searched from January 2018 to February 2024: UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network, MedSci, Yi Maitong Guidelines, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Oncology Nursing Society, Radiology Assistant database, Society and College of Radiographers, Australian JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center database, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang Data, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, Chinese Biology Medicine, etc. Results: A total of 22 articles which met the inclusion criteria were included in the study, comprising six guidelines, nine systematic reviews, four evidence summaries, one clinical decision, one expert consensus, and one randomized controlled trial. We summarized 35 pieces of evidence across four aspects: influence factor, evaluation and monitoring, prevention and treatment, care and health education. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive summary of the best evidence for the prevention and management of RD in patients with breast cancer. It is recommended that subsequent evidence transformation should be conducted based on specific clinical circumstances to standardize the process of clinical prevention and management of RD. Systematic review registration: This study was registered at the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing (Registration No. ES20244311).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.