Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220114›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024

The effect of editing clinical contours on deep-learning segmentation accuracy of the gross tumor volume in glioblastoma.

Kim M Hochreuter, Jintao Ren, Jasper Nijkamp, Stine S Korreman, Slávka Lukacova, Jesper F Kallehauge, Anouk K Trip

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical evaluation of two glioblastoma delineation methods based on neural networks.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kim M HochreuterDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jintao RenDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jasper NijkampDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Stine S KorremanDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Slávka LukacovaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jesper F KallehaugeDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anouk K TripDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Deep-learning (DL) models for segmentation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) in radiotherapy are generally based on clinical delineations which suffer from inter-observer variability. The aim of this study was to compare performance of a DL-model based on clinical glioblastoma GTVs to a model based on a single-observer edited version of the same GTVs. Materials and methods: The dataset included imaging data (Computed Tomography (CT), T1, contrast-T1 (T1C), and fluid-attenuated-inversion-recovery (FLAIR)) of 259 glioblastoma patients treated with post-operative radiotherapy between 2012 and 2019 at a single institute. The clinical GTVs were edited using all imaging data. The dataset was split into 207 cases for training/validation and 52 for testing.GTV segmentation models (nnUNet) were trained on clinical and edited GTVs separately and compared using Surface Dice with 1 mm tolerance (sDSC Results: The median (range) sDSC Conclusions: High segmentation accuracy was obtained by the DL-models. Editing of the clinical GTVs significantly increased DL performance with a relevant effect size. DL performance was robust for EOR and highly accurate using only T1C.

Indexed as

Deep learningEditing labelsGlioblastomaGTVRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39220114
PMCPMC11364127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.