Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220070›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2024

Lone-Star retractor perineal exposure method for laparoscopic abdominal perineal resection of rectal cancer.

Jun Ma, Dai-Bin Tang, Yu-Quan Tang, Da-Tian Wang, Peng Jiang, Ya-Ming Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun MaDepartment of General Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing 246000, Anhui Province, China.
Dai-Bin TangDepartment of General Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing 246000, Anhui Province, China.
Yu-Quan TangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing 246000, Anhui Province, China.
Da-Tian WangDepartment of General Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing 246000, Anhui Province, China.
Peng JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing 246000, Anhui Province, China.
Ya-Ming ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing 246000, Anhui Province, China. zhangyaming2014@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe abdominal perineal resection (APR), historically referred to as Mile's procedure, stands as a time-honored surgical intervention for rectal cancer management. Advancements in surgical techniques and the advent of neoadjuvant therapies have significantly improved the rate of sphincter preservation among patients afflicted with rectal cancer, including those with ultralow rectal cancer. Despite these improvements, APR maintains its irreplaceable role in the clinical landscape, particularly for cases involving low rectal cancer with encroachment on the external anal sphincter or levator ani muscles. Optimal perineal exposure stands as a pivotal phase in APR, given that the precision of this maneuver is directly correlated with both the safety of the surgery and the patient's subsequent long-term prognosis.

aimTo evaluate the value of Lone-Star retractor (LSR) perineal exposure method in the treatment for laparoscopic APR of rectal cancer.

methodsWe reviewed the records of 38 patients with rectal cancer at Anqing Municipal Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023, including 20 patients who underwent the APR procedure with a LSR perineal exposure method (LSR group) and 18 patients who underwent the APR procedure with a conventional perineal exposure method (control group). In the LSR group, following incision of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, the LSR was placed and dynamically adjusted according to the surgical plane to fully expose the perineal operative field.

resultsA total of 38 patients underwent laparoscopic APR, none of whom were found to have distant metastasis upon intraoperative exploration. Perineal blood loss, the postoperative hospital stays and the wound pain scores in the LSR group were significantly lower than those in the control group. A single surgeon completed the perineal operation significantly more often in the LSR group than in the control group (

conclusionThe application of the LSR technique might be helpful for performing perineal exposure during APR for rectal cancer and could reduce the incidence of perineal complications, shorten the postoperative hospital stay, improve postoperative pain, and allow one surgeon to perform the perineal operation.

Indexed as

Abdominal perineal resectionLone-Star retractorPerineal exposure methodRectal cancerTechnique

Identifiers

PMID39220070
PMCPMC11362942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.