ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2024
Automated analysis of fetal heart rate baseline/acceleration/deceleration using MTU-Net3 + model.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical practice, obstetricians use visual interpretation of fetal heart rate (FHR) to diagnose fetal conditions, but inconsistencies among interpretations can hinder accuracy. This study introduces MTU-Net3+, a deep learning model designed for automated, multi-task FHR analysis, aiming to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. The proposed MTU-Net3 + was built upon the UNet3 + architecture, incorporating an encoder, a decoder, full-scale skip connections, and a deep supervision module, and further integrates a self-attention mechanism and bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory layers to enhance its performance. The MTU-Net3 + model accepts the preprocessed 20-minute FHR signals as input, outputting categorical probabilities and baseline values for each time point. The proposed MTU-Net3 + model was trained on a subset of a public database, and was tested on the remaining data of the public database and a private database. In the remaining public datasets, this model achieved F1 scores of 84.21% for deceleration (F1.Dec) and 61.33% for acceleration (F1.Acc), with a Root Mean Square Baseline Difference (RMSD.BL) of 3.46 bpm, 0% of points with an absolute difference exceeding 15 bpm(D15bpm), a Synthetic Inconsistency Coefficient (SI) of 44.82%, and a Morphological Analysis Discordance Index (MADI) of 7.00%. On the private dataset, the model recorded an RMSD.BL of 1.37 bpm, 0% D15bpm, F1.Dec of 100%, F1.Acc of 87.50%, an SI of 12.20% and a MADI of 2.79%. The MTU-Net3 + model proposed in this study performed well in automated FHR analysis, demonstrating its potential as an effective tool in the field of fetal health assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.