Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220032›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2024

Review on spiking neural network-based ECG classification methods for low-power environments.

Hansol Choi, Jangsoo Park, Jongseok Lee, Donggyu Sim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hansol ChoiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul, Korea.
Jangsoo ParkDepartment of Computer Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul, Korea.
Jongseok LeeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul, Korea.
Donggyu SimDepartment of Computer Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2794-9932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reviews arrhythmia classification studies using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. Research on automatically diagnosing arrhythmia in daily life has been actively underway for early detection and treatment of heart disease. Development of automatic arrhythmia classification using ECG signal began based on handcrafted morphological feature extraction and machine learning-based classification methods. As deep neural networks (DNN) show excellent performance in the signal processing field, studies using various types of DNN are also being conducted in ECG classification. However, these DNN-based studies have extremely high computational complexity, making it challenging to perform real-time classification, and are unsuitable for low-power environments such as wearable devices due to high power consumption. Currently, research based on spiking neural network (SNN), which mimics the low-power operation of the human nervous system, is attracting attention as a method that can dramatically reduce complexity and power consumption. The classification accuracy of the SNN-based ECG classification studies is close to that of the DNN-based studies. When combined with neuromorphic hardware, it shows ultra-low-power performance, suggesting the possibility of use in lightweight devices. In this paper, the SNN-based ECG classification studies for low-power environments are mainly reviewed, and prior to this, conventional and DNN-based ECG classification studies are also reviewed. We hope that this review will be helpful to researchers and engineers interested in the field of ECG classification.

Indexed as

ArrhythmiaArtificial neural networkClassificationElectrocardiogramSpiking neural network

Identifiers

PMID39220032
PMCPMC11362428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.