Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220031›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2024

Cross-domain additive learning of new knowledge rather than replacement.

Jiahao Liu, Ge Jiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiahao LiuCollege of Computer Science, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang, 421008 China.
Ge JiaoCollege of Computer Science, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang, 421008 China.ORCID 0000-0002-6202-3158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical clinical scenarios for reasons such as patient privacy, information protection and data migration, when domain adaptation is needed for real scenarios, the source-domain data is often inaccessible and only the pre-trained source model on the source-domain is available. Existing solutions for this type of problem tend to forget the rich task experience previously learned on the source domain after adapting, which means that the model simply overfits the target-domain data when adapting and does not learn robust features that facilitate real task decisions. We address this problem by exploring the particular application of source-free domain adaptation in medical image segmentation and propose a two-stage additive source-free adaptation framework. We generalize the domain-invariant features by constraining the core pathological structure and semantic consistency between different perspectives. And we reduce the segmentation generated by locating and filtering elements that may have errors through Monte-Carlo uncertainty estimation. We conduct comparison experiments with some other methods on a cross-device polyp segmentation and a cross-modal brain tumor segmentation dataset, the results in both the target and source domains verify that the proposed method can effectively solve the domain offset problem and the model retains its dominance on the source domain after learning new knowledge of the target domain.This work provides valuable exploration for achieving additive learning on the target and source domains in the absence of source data and offers new ideas and methods for adaptation research in the field of medical image segmentation.

Indexed as

Domain adaptationDomain alignmentImage segmentationUncertainty estimate

Identifiers

PMID39220031
PMCPMC11362399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.