ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2024
Prediction of prognosis in supramalleolar osteotomy with or without additional fibula osteotomy by approaching a biomechanical study: a finite element analysis.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Fibula-Preserving Supramalleolar Osteotomy Combined with Arthroscopic Modified Broström Operation in Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Functional and Radiological Benefits of Adding Fibular Osteotomy to Supramalleolar Osteotomy in Ankle Osteoarthritis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) is a representative procedure to restore a malalignment in the varus ankle deformity by shifting the concentrated pressure on the medial ankle joint to the lateral area. Additionally, fibula osteotomy (FO) is selectively selected and performed according to the surgeon's preference. However, it is controversial whether FO is effective in shifting the abnormal pressure from the medial to the lateral area on the ankle joint. Some cadaveric studies have been performed to prove this. However, it is difficult to consistently reconstruct amount of the varus ankle deformities angle in cadavers and to guarantee reliable contact pressure between the ankle joint. Thus, the aim of this study was predicted and quantitatively compared a peak pressure between single SMO and SMO with FO procedure by using a finite element analysis as a powerful biomechanical tool to those limitations of cadaveric study. This study reconstructed total 4 3D foot and ankle models including a normal and pre-op model and 2 post-op models. The pre-op model was modified by assigning 10° varus tilting corresponding to stage 3b in the classification of varus ankle osteoarthritis based on the validated normal model. Also, the post-op models were reconstructed by applying single SMO and SMO with FO, respectively. All of the models were assumed as one-leg standing position and to mimic smooth ankle joint motion. Peak contact pressure change was predicted at the medial ankle joint by using computational simulation. As a result, 2 post-op models showed a remarkably peak pressure reduction by up to 5.5 times on the medial tibiotalar joint. However, a comparison between single SMO and SMO with FO model showed no appreciable differences. In conclusion, this study predicted that single SMO may be as effective as SMO with FO in reducing peak contact pressure on the medial tibiotalar joint in varus ankle osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.