ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2024
Spiking neural networks for biomedical signal analysis.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Spiking Neural Network for Non-Invasive Glucose Estimation on Wearable Bioimpedance Biosensors, with a Multiplication-Free Neuromorphic Path.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Neuromorphic Technologies for Neuroengineering: From Adaptive Stimulation to SNN-Based Inference and Deployable Biointerfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From deep brain stimulation to brain-computer interfaces: current progress in implantable neurotechnology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Heart Sound Classification with MFCCs and Wavelet Daubechies Analysis Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Toward brain-inspired foundation model for EEG signal processing: our opinion.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has had a significant impact on human life because of its pervasiveness across industries and its rapid development. Although AI has achieved superior performance in learning and reasoning, it encounters challenges such as substantial computational demands, privacy concerns, communication delays, and high energy consumption associated with cloud-based models. These limitations have facilitated a paradigm change in on-device AI processing, which offers enhanced privacy, reduced latency, and improved power efficiency through the direct execution of computations on devices. With advancements in neuromorphic systems, spiking neural networks (SNNs), often referred to as the next generation of AI, are currently in focus as on-device AI. These technologies aim to mimic the human brain efficiency and provide promising real-time processing with minimal energy. This study reviewed the application of SNNs in the analysis of biomedical signals (electroencephalograms, electrocardiograms, and electromyograms), and consequently, investigated the distinctive attributes and prospective future paths of SNNs models in the field of biomedical signal analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.