ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2024
Spiking neural networks for physiological and speech signals: a review.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Lightweight Keyword Spotting Method Using a Convolutional Spiking Neural Network with Learnable Synaptic Delays.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuromorphic Technologies for Neuroengineering: From Adaptive Stimulation to SNN-Based Inference and Deployable Biointerfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Integrating chemical artificial intelligence and cognitive computing for predictive analysis of biological pathways: a case for intrinsically disordered proteins.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) into the analysis and interpretation of physiological and speech signals has emerged as a groundbreaking approach, offering enhanced performance and deeper insights into the underlying biological processes. This review aims to summarize key advances, methodologies, and applications of SNNs within these domains, highlighting their unique ability to mimic the temporal dynamics and efficiency of the human brain. We dive into the core principles of SNNs, their neurobiological underpinnings, and the computational advantages they bring to signal processing, particularly in handling the temporal and spatial complexities inherent in physiological and speech data. Comparative analyses with conventional neural network models are presented to underscore the superior efficiency, lower power consumption, and higher temporal resolution of SNNs. The review further explores challenges and future prospects, highlighting the potential of SNNs to revolutionize wearable healthcare monitoring systems, neuroprosthetic devices, and natural language processing technologies. By providing a comprehensive overview of current strategies, this review aims to inspire innovative approaches in the field, fostering advances in real-time and energy-efficient processing of complex biological signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.