ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2024
Unsupervised spike sorting for multielectrode arrays based on spike shape features and location methods.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MEA-Based Graph Deviation Network for Early Autism Syndrome Signatures in Human Forebrain Organoids.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable simultaneous measurement of spike trains from numerous neurons, owing to advancements in microfabrication technology. These probes are highly valuable for comprehending the intricate dynamics of neuronal networks. Spike sorting is a pivotal step in comprehensively analyzing the activity of neuronal networks from extracellular recordings. However, the accuracy of spike sorting is relatively low due to the dense sampling of spikes in MEAs. Here, we propose an unsupervised pipeline named UMAP-COM method, which utilizes combined features to address this problem. These combined features comprise dominant spike shape features extracted by the uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), as well as spike locations estimated by the center of mass (COM). We validate the UMAP-COM method on publicly available datasets from different kinds of probes, demonstrating that it is more accurate than other spike sorting methods. Furthermore, we conduct separate evaluations of spike shape feature extraction methods and spike localization methods. In this comparison, UMAP emerges as the superior feature extraction method, demonstrating its effectiveness in accurately representing spike shapes. Additionally, we find that the COM method outperforms other spike localization methods, highlighting its ability to enhance the accuracy of spike sorting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.