ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2024
Nonlinear Gradient Field Estimation in Diffusion MRI Tensor Simulation.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A phantom mimicking layered biological microenvironments investigated with 7T diffusion weighted MRI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gradient nonlinearities not only induce spatial distortion in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but also introduce discrepancies between intended and acquired diffusion sensitization in diffusion weighted (DW) MRI. Advances in scanner performance have increased the importance of correcting gradient nonlinearities. The most common approaches for gradient nonlinear field estimations rely on phantom calibration field maps which are not always feasible, especially on retrospective data. Here, we derive a quadratic minimization problem for the complete gradient nonlinear field (L(r)). This approach starts with corrupt diffusion signal and estimates the L(r) in two scenarios: (1) the true diffusion tensor known and (2) the true diffusion tensor unknown (i.e., diffusion tensor is estimated). We show the validity of this mathematical approach, both theoretically and through tensor simulation. The estimated field is assessed through diffusion tensor metrics: mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and principal eigenvector (V1). In simulation with 300 diffusion tensors, the study shows the mathematical model is not ill-posed and remains stable. We find when the true diffusion tensor is known (1) the change in determinant of the estimated L(r) field and the true field is near zero and (2) the median difference in estimated L(r) corrected diffusion metrics to true values is near zero. We find the results of L(r) estimation are dependent on the level of L(r) corruption. This work provides an approach to estimate gradient field without the need for additional calibration scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.