Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39219976›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Removal of an Accessory Spleen After a Failed Splenectomy for Immune Thrombocytopenia.

Muzi Meng, Paul Joon Koo Choi, Reshma Pydi, Daniel T Farkas

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muzi MengSchool of Medicine, American University of the Caribbean, Cupecoy, SXM.
Paul Joon Koo ChoiGeneral Surgery, BronxCare Health System, New York, USA.
Reshma PydiSurgery, BronxCare Health System, New York, USA.
Daniel T FarkasSurgery, BronxCare Health System, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is a challenging condition to manage especially when conventional treatment methods, including splenectomy, fail. This report evaluates the effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of accessory spleen for chronic refractory ITP after an initial splenectomy. A 73-year-old African American male with a history of ITP, previously treated with laparoscopic splenectomy nine years ago, presented with severe thrombocytopenia that was found to be refractory to medical therapies. Platelet counts were monitored, and the absence of Howell-Jolly bodies was noted in the peripheral blood smear. Imaging studies over the past eight years indicated the growth of a mass in the left upper abdomen, suggesting a possible accessory spleen. Given the overwhelming evidence of a splenule in refractory thrombocytopenia, laparoscopic exploration and mass removal were conducted. Histologic analysis of the removed mass confirmed a splenule. Despite the complete removal of the mass, postoperative platelet counts remained consistently low and unresponsive to the resumption of medical therapies. This study emphasizes the limitations of accessory splenectomy for refractory ITP and highlights the need for further research to clarify the long-term effectiveness of this surgical procedure in these patients.

Indexed as

accessory spleenidiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (itp)immune thrombocytopenialaproscopic splenectomyrefractory itp

Identifiers

PMID39219976
PMCPMC11364356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.