Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39219955›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Judicious Transfusion of Platelets Among Neonates: A Systematic Review.

Saritha Kamsetti, Saritha Tammali, Ashok Kumar Urakurva, Rakesh Kotha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saritha KamsettiPediatrics, Government Medical College, Vikarabad, Vikarabad, IND.
Saritha TammaliPediatrics, Niloufer Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Ashok Kumar UrakurvaPediatrics, Government Medical College, Vikarabad, Vikarabad, IND.
Rakesh KothaNeonatology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In newborns, especially premature babies, there is a high association between thrombocytopenia and bleeding, particularly intraventricular hemorrhage, which may be due to immaturity. It was usual clinical practice that neonates should be transfused with higher platelet counts than older children or adults to reduce their risk of bleeding. However, after keen observations, we noticed that bleeding and mortality were more common in newborns who received more platelet transfusions. The mechanisms underlying the adverse effects of platelet transfusions in neonates may be due to higher antigenicity and immunological factors. We know that neonatal platelets are hyporeactive; this hyporeactivity is balanced by factors in the neonatal blood that promote coagulation, such as increased hematocrit, von Willebrand factor, and fibrinogen, which, on balance, leads to normal primary neonatal hemostasis. Platelets are very similar to adults in number, but functional capabilities were less, and for the reasons mentioned above, particularly bleeding time was short. Theologically, neonatal platelet lifespan was high to compensate for less production. We started this review because we observed that many babies were not having bleeding symptoms in some instances of severe thrombocytopenia. Many well-active babies are receiving unnecessary transfusions, as human blood is precious, and many young neonatologists are going on protocol-based excessive transfusions. This stimulated us to write a review.

Indexed as

neonatal hemorrhage"neonate"platelet-rich plasma/prpthrombocytetransfusion-related reactions

Identifiers

PMID39219955
PMCPMC11362868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.