ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Evaluation of Colistin-Susceptibility Testing in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Using VITEK, Colistin Broth Disc Elution, and Colistin Broth Microdilution.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence, trends, and molecular insights into colistin resistance among gram-negative bacteria in Egypt: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2025Pooled it
- Modification of CLSI Recommended Colistin Agar Test for Enterobacterales to Handle Large Sample Load in a High-Throughput Laboratory.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of an automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system performance for colistin susceptibility in carbapenem-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Six Commercial and Noncommercial Colistin Resistance Diagnostics.MicrobiologyOpen · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Colistin Susceptibility in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates Using Broth Microdilution, MICRONAUT-MIC-Strip, and VITEK MS.MicrobiologyOpen · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study aimed to compare the results of colistin-susceptibility testing performed using the automated VITEK system, colistin broth microdilution (BMD), and colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis exploratory study was conducted in a tertiary care center in South India. Carbapenem-resistant
resultsAmong the 49 carbapenem-resistant
conclusionCBDE is a reliable and cost-effective method that can be adopted in the routine microbiology laboratory for colistin-susceptibility testing, as it does not require any specialized equipment or techniques and is 100% consistent with the gold standard BMD method. Although the automated VITEK system is used in most routine microbiological laboratories for antibiotic-susceptibility testing, it cannot be reliably used for colistin-susceptibility testing due to its high error rates (very major error rate of 28.5%; major error rate of 2.4%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.