ReviewCureus2024
Multi-Organizational Insights Into Radiological Safety Standards in High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The review provides an extensive study of regulations and recommendations set forth by organizations worldwide in the domain of high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for the prevention and mitigation of radiation hazards. The relevant reports and publications by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), United States (US) Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) were accessed, and necessary information was compiled to clarify and understand concepts, similarities, and differences in safety standards concerning to the topic. The regulations and guidance are categorized under three major components of safety, namely layout, equipment, and source. Layout category accesses structure, design, layout, and survey. The equipment category summarizes the requirements of equipment, installation, commissioning, quality assurance (QA) and performance, safety precautions and preparedness, safety procedures, and instructions. The source category includes requirements for sealed source possession and use, calibration, categorization, certification, licensing, QA tests, and security. IAEA gives inclusive guidance on radiation protection and regulatory requirements, forming the basis of reference for other organizations worldwide. AERB regulates the radiation facilities in India; therefore, most set-ups follow their safety standards and instructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.