ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Examination of Information Quality on Public Instagram Profiles Regarding Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism: A Study in São Paulo State, Brazil.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TikTok as a Source of Information on Temporomandibular Disorders: Reliable Health Education or Misinformation?Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, social media emerges as a swift and efficient channel for disseminating knowledge in dentistry; however, it is imperative to assess whether this information aligns with scientific evidence. This study aims to evaluate the quality of information found on public Instagram profiles in São Paulo State, Brazil, regarding the utilization of botulinum toxin (BTx) for bruxism treatment. Material and Methods: The data were categorized into three qualitative groups: information pertaining to bruxism diagnosis, treatment options for bruxism, and the application of BTx for bruxism. Following the selection of pertinent publications, 50 public profiles were included in the analysis. The publications were assessed utilizing the Global Quality Scale (GQS). Results: A total of 20,546 posts were tallied across the 50 profiles, with 230 relating to bruxism diagnosis, 166 discussing bruxism treatment options, and 78 mentioning the use of BTx for bruxism. Of these 78 posts addressing BTx for bruxism, 61% did not align with current scientific references, while 39% did. GQS analysis disclosed predominantly "poor quality" content (GQS = 2). Conclusions: It is concluded that the themes of bruxism and BTx are frequently broached on public Instagram profiles, yet the quality of the available information is generally subpar and often lacks scientific substantiation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.