ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Risk Factors associated with noncarious cervical lesions.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) is the dental structure loss unrelated to caries. The aim was to investigate the possible relationship between bruxism, age, gender, daily routine and dietary habits and NCCL, and correlate with sensitivity and position in the dental arch. Material and Methods: 245 patients aged between 18 and 40 participated in the survey, in which a questionnaire focused on parafunctional habits, erosion, abrasion, dental abfraction and acidic diet was conducted. Facial symmetry analysis, masseter hypertrophy, occlusion evaluation, and presence of wear facets and NCCL. Data were expressed as absolute and percentage frequency and were analyzed using the Fisher's Exact/Chi-square tests and a multinomial logistic regression model. Results: NCCLs was observed in 46.6 % in the participants. Bruxism was observed in 64% of the individuals, and stress in 33%. Wear facets and acidic diets were reported in 75% and 60% of the sample, respectively. There was no significant relationship between NCCL and gender (p = 0.74), bruxism ( Conclusions: Age showed a direct correlation with noncarious cervical lesions. Factors including gender and dietary and parafunctional habits, such as bruxism, were not differential regarding the presence of NCCL.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.