ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Impact of mechanical circulatory support on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes stratified by vasoactive-inotropic score: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To assess whether mechanical circulatory support (MCS), including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), can help improve neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study performed in China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. Adult patients with OHCA admitted between January 2015 and June 2023. Quantitative score of vasoactive-inotropic agents and qualitative interventions of MCS, including IABP and ECMO after OHCA. Multivariate regression evaluated the efficacy of each MCS approach in patients stratified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS). Results: A total of 334 patients were included and analyzed, 122 (36.5%) had favorable neurological outcomes and 215 (64.4%) survived ≥90 days. These patients were stratified by VIS: 0-25, 26-100, 101-250, and >250. In patients with a VIS > 100, ECMO with or without IABP ensured favorable neurological outcomes and survival after OHCA compared to non-MCS interventions ( Conclusions: ECMO with or without IABP therapy may improve post-OHCA neurological outcomes and survival in patients with an expected VIS-24 h > 100 (e.g., epinephrine dose reaches 3 mg during CPR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.