ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Successful treatment of acute device thrombosis of patent foramen ovale with slow infusion of low-dose thrombolytic therapy.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is used in selected individuals to eliminate the risk of recurrent cerebral embolism due to paradoxical embolization. Although device thrombosis is rare, it can cause serious complications. Herein, we report a 40-year-old woman who developed acute PFO closure device-associated thrombus and was subsequently treated with slow infusion of low-dose tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) (25 mg/6 h). Case summary: A 40-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital because of an cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain demonstrated the presence of an ischaemic lesion in the right cerebellar infarct. Since no pathological finding was detected that could cause CVA, it was considered that there might be paradoxical embolism due to PFO. Percutaneous PFO closure was decided by the heart and brain team. The occluder was implanted under transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy guidance. Although activated clotting time was 250 s, hypermobile acute thrombus measuring 11 × 5 mm was seen on the left atrial side of the PFO device. Slow infusion of low-dose t-PA treatment was given. As soon as after a single-dose t-PA, control TEE was performed and it was seen that almost the entire thrombus was lysed. The patient did not have any complications during the treatment period. Discussion: Acute PFO device thrombosis is a rare but important complication. If there is no contraindication for lytic treatment in acutely developing large PFO device thrombosis, slow infusion of low-dose t-PA may be useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.