Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39219760›Full record

Trial reportBulletin of the World Health Organization2024

Home visits versus fixed-site care by community health workers and child survival: a cluster-randomized trial, Mali.

Jenny Liu, Emily Treleaven, Caroline Whidden, Saibou Doumbia, Naimatou Kone, Amadou Beydi Cisse, Aly Diop, Mohamed Berthé, Mahamadou Guindo, Brahima Mamadou Koné and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jenny LiuInstitute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America (USA).
Emily TreleavenInstitute for Social Research, 426 Thompson Street, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI48103, USA.
Caroline WhiddenMuso, SEMA, Bamako, Mali.
Saibou DoumbiaMuso, SEMA, Bamako, Mali.
Naimatou KoneMuso, SEMA, Bamako, Mali.
Amadou Beydi CisseMuso, SEMA, Bamako, Mali.
Aly DiopMinistère de la Santé et du Développement Social, Bamako, Mali.
Mohamed BerthéMinistère de la Santé et du Développement Social, Bamako, Mali.
Mahamadou GuindoMinistère de la Santé et du Développement Social, Bamako, Mali.
Brahima Mamadou KonéMinistère de la Santé et du Développement Social, Bamako, Mali.
Michael P FayNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Rockville, USA.
Ari D JohnsonDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Kassoum KayentaoMalaria Research and Training Centre, University of Science, Technic and Technologies of Bamako, Bamako, Mali.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To test the effect of proactive home visits by trained community health workers (CHWs) on child survival. Methods: We conducted a two arm, parallel, unmasked cluster-randomized trial in 137 village-clusters in rural Mali. From February 2017 to January 2020, 31 761 children enrolled at the trial start or at birth. Village-clusters received either primary care services by CHWs providing regular home visits (intervention) or by CHWs providing care at a fixed site (control). In both arms, user fees were removed and primary health centres received staffing and infrastructure improvements before trial start. Using lifetime birth histories from women aged 15-49 years surveyed annually, we estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) for intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects on under-five mortality using Poisson regression models. Findings: Over three years, we observed 52 970 person-years (27 332 in intervention arm; 25 638 in control arm). During the trial, 909 children in the intervention arm and 827 children in the control arm died. The under-five mortality rate declined from 142.8 (95% CI: 133.3-152.9) to 56.7 (95% CI: 48.5-66.4) deaths per 1000 live births in the intervention arm; and from 154.3 (95% CI: 144.3-164.9) to 54.9 (95% CI: 45.2-64.5) deaths per 1000 live births in the control arm. Intention-to-treat (IRR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88-1.19) and per-protocol estimates (IRR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.87-1.18) showed no difference between study arms. Conclusion: Though proactive home visits did not reduce under-five mortality, system-strengthening measures may have contributed to the decline in under-five mortality in both arms.

Indexed as

Child MortalityCommunity Health WorkersHouse CallsAdolescentAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaleMaliMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRural Population

Identifiers

PMID39219760
PMCPMC11362699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.