Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39219750›Full record

ReviewAIMS microbiology2024

Fungal photoinactivation doses for UV radiation and visible light-a data collection.

Anna-Maria Gierke, Petra Vatter, Martin Hessling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIMS microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Investigation on possible resistance ofmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna-Maria GierkeUlm University of Applied Sciences, Department of Medical Engineering and Mechatronics, Albert-Einstein-Allee 55, D-89081 Ulm (Germany).
Petra VatterUlm University of Applied Sciences, Department of Medical Engineering and Mechatronics, Albert-Einstein-Allee 55, D-89081 Ulm (Germany).
Martin HesslingUlm University of Applied Sciences, Department of Medical Engineering and Mechatronics, Albert-Einstein-Allee 55, D-89081 Ulm (Germany).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly two million people die each year from fungal infections. Additionally, fungal crop infections jeopardize the global food supply. The use of 254 nm UVC radiation from mercury vapor lamps is a disinfection technique known to be effective against all microorganisms, and there are surveys of published UVC sensitivities. However, these mainly focus on bacteria and viruses. Therefore, a corresponding overview for fungi will be provided here, including far-UVC, UVB, UVA, and visible light, in addition to the conventional 254 nm UVC inactivation. The available literature was searched for photoinactivation data for fungi in the above-mentioned spectral ranges. To standardize the presentation, the mean log-reduction doses were retrieved and sorted by fungal species, spectral range, wavelength, and medium, among others. Additionally, the median log-reduction dose was determined for fungi in transparent liquid media. Approximately 400 evaluable individual data sets from publications over the last 100 years were compiled. Most studies were performed with 254 nm radiation from mercury vapor lamps on

Indexed as

Aspergillus fumigatusCandida albicansCandida aurisCryptococcus neoformansFar-UVCSaccharomyces cerevisiaeUVAUVBUVCvisible light

Identifiers

PMID39219750
PMCPMC11362276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.